This whole exchange really peaked my interest as I’ve been continuing to think a great deal about taxes. As I’ve mentioned before, I’m worried about the prospect of taxes being increased for those people that are considered to be “rich”. Much of the purpose of this tax hike on the rich is to fund government programs that will provide benefits and services to those who otherwise couldn’t afford them. Basically the Robin Hood “take from the rich and give to the poor” principle, also known as the “redistribution of wealth” principle of Socialism. This is the next social policy purposed by president-elect Barack Obama.
The trouble with this policy is that it further exacerbates the problem of “Big Government” stepping in and dictating where tax payer money goes with no accountability as to how well it is being utilized. This is frustrating to many of us who pay taxes since we have very little control of our money at this point. As you can imagine, this frustration would be increased significantly to those who pay even more into the tax pool, like the “rich”. It’s this lack of control over our own money that drives people to such anger and frustration. Why do we let state and federal bureaucracies handle so much of our money when the do such a poor job at it? Why do we have so many government funded programs that have no accountability? What we end up with are programs that get taken advantage of by people who don’t need them but want a free hand out. These programs have good intentions, but good intentions are worthless without proper execution and follow through.
A close relative of mine told me over the weekend that she is losing her job with the state because so many people are abusing government funded services. So these dishonest people bleed the system dry and the result is our tax dollars not getting to the people who really need it and people are honest workers get laid off.
This is where foundations, churches, non-profit groups, and the lottery really do the most good. If people choose to give to one of these organizations they can feel good about where the money is going and not feel its being decided for them. Plus, these other organizations are smaller and operate more efficiently.
The bottom line...
Government Programs tax rich people to provide for those in need (force them to give) where as these other organizations encourage rich people to give, assure their money is working most effectively, and give ROI (not necessarily monitary). With increased tax incentives for people who give to these organizations there shouldn't be any problem with the amount of contributions made and it will give people more control over their own money.



